An Experimental Comparison between Wing Root and Wingtip ‎Corrugation Patterns of Dragonfly Wing at Ultra-low Reynolds ‎Number and High Angles of Attack‎

Document Type : Research Paper


1 Department of Mechanical Engineering, Najafabad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Najafabad, Iran‎

2 Aerospace and Energy Conversion Research Center, Najafabad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Najafabad, Iran ‎

3 Département de Génie Mécanique, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, J1K 2R1, Canada‎


This study presents the empirical comparison between the wing root and wingtip corrugation patterns of dragonfly wing in the newly-built wind-tunnel at the IAUN. The main objective of the research is to investigate the effect of wingtip and wing root corrugations on aerodynamic forces and the flow physics around the cross-sections at Re=10000 and the angle of attack of 0° to 30°. For this aim, two cross-sections are extracted from wing root (first cross-section) and wingtip (second cross-section). The first cross-section has corrugations with higher density than the second cross-section. The comparison of lift coefficients obtained from pressure distribution and force measurement indicates an acceptable agreement between the results. Also, Particle Image Velocity (PIV) technique is used to measure the velocity field. The results show that all corrugation patterns do not have positive effects on the aerodynamic forces. The second cross-section can generate considerable aerodynamic forces compared to the first cross-section. At α=25°, the lift coefficient generated by the second cross-section is 90% and 25% higher than that of the first cross-section and the flat plate, respectively. Based on results, corrugations in the wing root's vicinity have a crucial role in the solidity of insect wings; however, corrugations in the wing tip's vicinity play a vital role in generating adequate aerodynamic forces. The comparison conducted in the current research reveals the second cross-section is an appropriate replacement for the flat plate in MAVs due to generating more essential forces for flight.


Main Subjects

Publisher’s Note Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

[1] Lee, N., Lee, S., Cho, H., Shin, S., Effect of flexibility on flapping wing characteristics in hover and forward flight, Computers & Fluids, 173, 2018, 111-117.
[2] Shyy, W., Kang, C.K., Chirarattananon, P., Ravi, S., Liu, H., Aerodynamics, sensing and control of insect-scale flapping-wing flight, Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 472(2186), 2016, 20150712.
[3] Dudley, R., The Biomechanics of Insect Flight: Form, Function, Evolution, Princeton University Press, 2000.
[4] Noda, R., Nakata, T., Liu, H., Effects of wing deformation on aerodynamic performance of a revolving insect wing, Acta Mechanica Sinica, 30(6), 2014, 819-827.
[5] Srygley R.B., Thomas AL. Unconventional lift-generating mechanisms in free-flying butterflies, Nature, 420(6916), 2002, 660-664.
[6] Taylor G.K., Nudds R.L., Thomas A.L., Flying and swimming animals cruise at a Strouhal number tuned for high power efficiency, Nature, 425(6959), 2003, 707-711.
[7] Lentink D., Flying like a fly, Nature, 498(7454), 2013, 306-307.
[8] Portugal S.J., Hubel T.Y., Fritz J., Heese S., Trobe D., Voelkl B., Hailes S., Wilson A.M., Usherwood J.R., Upwash exploitation and downwash avoidance by flap phasing in ibis formation flight, Nature, 505(7483), 2014, 399-402.
[9] Jafferis N.T., Helbling E.F., Karpelson M., Wood R.J., Untethered flight of an insect-sized flapping-wing microscale aerial vehicle, Nature, 570(7762), 2019, 491-495.
[10] Thomas, A.L., Taylor, G.K., Srygley, R.B., Nudds, R.L., Bomphrey, R.J., Dragonfly flight: free-flight and tethered flow visualizations reveal a diverse array of unsteady lift-generating mechanisms, controlled primarily via angle of attack, Journal of Experimental Biology, 207(24), 2004, 4299-4323.
[11] Somps, C., Luttges, M., Dragonfly flight: novel uses of unsteady separated flows, Science, 228(4705), 1985, 1326-1329.
[12] Rees, C.J., Aerodynamic properties of an insect wing section and a smooth aerofoil compared, Nature, 258(5531), 1975, 141-142.
[13] Kesel, A.B., Philippi, U., Nachtigall, W., Biomechanical aspects of the insect wing: an analysis using the finite element method, Computers in Biology and Medicine, 28(4), 1998, 423-437.
[14] Kesel, A.B., Aerodynamic characteristics of dragonfly wing sections compared with technical aerofoils, Journal of Experimental Biology, 203(20), 2000, 3125-3135.
[15] McCroskey, W.J., Unsteady airfoils, Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 114(1), 1982, 285-311.
[16] Newman, B.G., Savage, S.G., Schouella, D., Model Tests on a Wing Section of an Aeschna Dragonfly, Scale Effects in Animal Locomotion, 1977.
[17] Rudolph, R., Aerodynamic properties of Libellula quadrimaculata L.(Anisoptera: Libellulidae), and the flow around smooth and corrugated wing section models during gliding flight, Odonatologica, 7(1), 1978, 49-58.
[18] Rees, C.J., Aerodynamic properties of an insect wing section and a smooth aerofoil compared, Nature, 258(5531), 1975, 141-142.
[19] Okamoto, M., Yasuda, K., Azuma, A., Aerodynamic characteristics of the wings and body of a dragonfly, Journal of Experimental Biology, 199(2), 1996, 281-294.
[20] Wakeling, J.M., Ellington, C.P., Dragonfly flight. I. Gliding flight and steady-state aerodynamic forces, Journal of Experimental Biology, 200(3), 1997, 543-556.
[21] Buckholz, R.H., The functional role of wing corrugations in living systems, Journal of Experimental Biology, 108(1), 1986, 93–97.
[22] Okamoto, M., Azuma, A., Experimental study on aerodynamic characteristics of unsteady wings at low Reynolds number, AIAA Journal, 43(12), 2005, 2526-2536.
[23] Meng, X.G., Xu, L., Sun, M., Aerodynamic effects of corrugation in flapping insect wings in hovering flight, Journal of Experimental Biology, 214(3), 2011, 432-444.
[24] Meng, X., Sun, M., Aerodynamic effects of corrugation in flapping insect wings in forward flight, Journal of Bionic Engineering, 8(2), 2011, 140-150.
[25] Lavimi, R., Hojaji, M., Dehghan Manshadi, M., Investigation of the aerodynamic performance and flow physics on cross sections of Dragonfly wing on flapping and pitching motion in low Reynolds number, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part G: Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 233(2), 2019, 589-603.
[26] Kim, W.K., Ko, J.H., Park, H.C., Byun, D., Effects of corrugation of the dragonfly wing on gliding performance, Journal of Theoretical Biology, 260(4), 2009,523-530.
[27] Thill, C., Downsborough, J.D., Lai, S.J., Bond, I.P., Jones, D.P., Aerodynamic study of corrugated skins for morphing wing applications, The Aeronautical Journal, 114(1154), 2010, 237-244.
[28] Barnes, C.J., Visbal, M.R., Numerical exploration of the origin of aerodynamic enhancements in [low-Reynolds number] corrugated airfoils, Physics of Fluids, 25(11), 2013, 115106.
[29] Levy, D.E., Seifert, A., Simplified dragonfly airfoil aerodynamics at Reynolds numbers below 8000, Physics of Fluids, 21(7), 2009, 071901.
[30] Vargas, A., Mittal, R., Aerodynamic performance of biological airfoils, In 2nd AIAA Flow Control Conference, Portland, Oregon, 2004.
[31] Kwok, M., Mittal, R., Experimental investigation of the aerodynamics of a modeled dragonfly wing section, In AIAA region I-MA Student Conference, Charlottesville, Virginia, 2005.
[32] Cheng, X., Sun, M., Wing-kinematics measurement and aerodynamics in a small insect in hovering flight, Scientific Reports, 6, 2016, 25706.
[33] Pritchard, P.J., Mitchell, J.W., Fox and McDonald's introduction to fluid mechanics, John Wiley & Sons, 2016.
[34] Cheng, M., Whyte, D.S., Lou, J., Numerical simulation of flow around a square cylinder in uniform-shear flow, Journal of Fluids and Structures, 23(2), 2007, 207-226.
[35] Lin, J.C., Towfighi, J., Rockwell, D., Instantaneous structure of the near-wake of a circular cylinder: on the effect of Reynolds, Journal of Fluids and Structures, 9(4), 1995, 409-418.
[36] Amitay, M., Glezer, A., Role of actuation frequency in controlled flow reattachment over a stalled airfoil, AIAA Journal, 40(2), 2002, 209-216.
[37] Tezuka, A., Sunada, Y., Rinoie, K., Surface pressure distributions on 4% circular arc airfoil at low Reynolds number, Journal of Aircraft, 45(6), 2008, 2164-2167.
[38] Hamdani, H.R., Naqvi, A., A study on the mechanism of high‐lift generation by an insect wing in unsteady motion at small Reynolds number, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, 67(5), 2011, 581-598.