Numerical Characterization of the In-Plane Shear Behaviour of Non-Crimp Fabric Composites

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors
1 Grupo de Elasticidad y Resistencia de Materiales. Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingeniería, Universidad de Sevilla. Camino Descubrimientos, S/N 41092 Sevilla, España
2 Escuela Politécnica Superior, Universidad de Sevilla. C/ Virgen de África, 7, Sevilla, 41011, España
Abstract
Experimental off-axis tensile tests aimed at characterising the in-plane shear behaviour of biaxial non-crimp fabric (NCF) composite laminates obtained from different directions within the same panel (warp and weft) reveal noteworthy variations. The in-plane shear modulus, shear strength, and shear strain at failure are significantly higher in the weft direction compared to the warp direction. To gain insights into the underlying reasons for these discrepancies, a parametric study is performed. This numerical study utilises mesoscopic 3D finite element (FE) models, representing the unit cell of a [+45,-45]2S NCF laminate. The analysis indicates that neither the presence of stitching yarns nor the out-of-plane fibre crimp induced by the yarns account for the substantial differences observed in the experimental findings. The maximum initial tangent in-plane shear modulus (Gxy), due to out-of-plane fibre crimp is only 2%. However, this difference increases to approximately 6.1% when stitching yarns are also included in the FE model. Moreover, it is found that fibre volume fraction of the tows and the non-linear behaviour negligibly impact the in-plane shear performance of the NCF laminate in both directions. In contrast, the study reveals that the primary factor contributing to the differences between the warp and weft directions is related to misalignment between the nominal 45° tows within the NCF composite laminate panels. The misalignment observed in the experimentally tested specimens is approximately 6°, leading to an 8.5% decrease in the Gxy of SP laminate (warp direction) compared to ST laminate (weft direction).
Keywords
Subjects

Publisher’s Note Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

[1] Bibo, G.A., Hogg, P.J., Kemp, M., Mechanical characterisation of glass- and carbon-fibre-reinforced composites made with non-crimp fabrics, Composites Science and Technology, 57, 1997, 1221–1241.
[2] Mattsson, D., Joffe, R., Varna, J., Methodology for characterization of internal structure parameters governing performance in NCF composites, Composites Part B: Engineering, 38, 2007, 44–57.
[3] Hogg, P.J., Ahmadnia, A., Guild, F.J., The mechanical properties of non-crimped fabric-based composites, Composites, 24, 1993, 423–432.
[4] Lomov, S.V., Non-crimp fabric composites: manufacturing, properties and applications, Oxford, Woodhead, 2011.
[5] Budwal, N., Kasper, K., Goering, J., Ward, C., Flexible low-cost tooling solutions for a one-shot resin infusion of a 3D woven and multi-textile preform, Procedia Manufacturing, 51, 2020, 856–863.
[6] Edgren, F., Physically based engineering models for NCF composites, Ph.D. Thesis, KTH, 2006.
[7] Haberkern, H., Tailor-made reinforcements, Reinforced Plastics, 50, 2006, 28–33.
[8] Tanaka, K., Tokura, D., Katayama, T., Effect of stitch tension of non-crimp fabric on the mechanical properties of CFRTP, Recent Advances in Structural Integrity Analysis-Proceedings of the International Congress, Woodhead Publishing, 2015.
[9] Tanaka, K., Yamada, M., Shinohara, M., Katayama, T., Effects of Stitching Parameters of Non-Crimp Fabrics on the Mechanical Properties of CFRTP, Advances in Fracture and Damage Mechanics IX, Key Engineering Materials, 452, 2011, 301–304.
[10] Koissin, V., Kustermans, J., Lomov, S.V., Verpoest, I., Van Den Broucke, B., Witzel, V., Structurally stitched NCF preforms: Quasi-static response, Composites Science and Technology, 69, 2009, 2701–2710.
[11] Drapier, S., Wisnom, M.R., Finite-element investigation of the compressive strength of non-crimp-fabric-based composites, Composites Science and Technology, 59, 1999, 1287–1297.
[12] Truong, T.C., Vettori, M., Lomov, S., Verpoest, I., Carbon composites based on multi-axial multi-ply stitched preforms. Part 4. Mechanical properties of composites and damage observation, Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, 36, 2005, 1207–1221.
[13] Heß, H., Himmel, N., Structurally stitched NCF CFRP laminates. Part 1: Experimental characterization of in-plane and out-of-plane properties, Composites Science and Technology, 71, 2011, 549–568.
[14] Yin, H., Li, Q., Iannucci, L., Meso-scale Finite Element (FE) modelling of biaxial carbon fibre non-crimp-fabric (NCF) based composites under uniaxial tension and in-plane shear, Composite Structures, 290, 2022, 115538.
[15] Oakeshott, J.L., Iannucci, L., Robinson, P., Development of a Representative Unit Cell Model for Bi-axial NCF Composites, Journal of Composite Materials, 41, 2007, 801–835.
[16] Heß, H., Roth, Y., Himmel, N., Elastic constants estimation of stitched NCF CFRP laminates based on a finite element unit-cell model, Composites Science and Technology, 67, 2007, 1081–1095.
[17] Drapier, S., Wisnom, M.R., A finite-element investigation of the interlaminar shear behaviour of non-crimp-fabric-based composites, Composites Science and Technology, 59, 1999, 2351–2362.
[18] Joffe, R., Mattsson, D., Modniks, J., Varna, J., Compressive failure analysis of non-crimp fabric composites with large out-of-plane misalignment of fiber bundles, Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, 36, 2005, 1030–1046.
[19] Marklund, E., Asp, L., Olsson, R., Transverse strength of unidirectional non-crimp fabric composites: Multiscale modelling, Composites Part B: Engineering, 65, 2014, 47–56.
[20] Chowdhury, I.R., O’Dowd, N.P., Comer, A.J., Failure prediction in a non-crimp basalt fibre reinforced epoxy composite, Composite Structures, 322, 2023, 117413.
[21] Edgren, F., Mattsson, D., Asp, L.E., Varna, J., Formation of damage and its effects on non-crimp fabric reinforced composites loaded in tension, Composites Science and Technology, 64, 2004, 675–692.
[22] Ferreira, L.M., Study of the Behaviour of Non-Crimp Fabric Laminates by 3D Finite Element Model, Ph.D. Thesis, Universidad de Sevilla, 2012.
[23] González, A., Graciani, E., París, F., Prediction of in-plane stiffness properties of non-crimp fabric laminates by means of 3D finite element analysis, Composites Science and Technology, 68, 2008, 121–131.
[24] Ferreira, L.M., Graciani, E., París, F., Modelling the waviness of the fibres in non-crimp fabric composites using 3D finite element models with straight tows, Composite Structures, 107, 2014, 79–87.
[25] Ferreira, L.M., Graciani, E., París, F., Three dimensional finite element study of the behaviour and failure mechanism of non-crimp fabric composites under in-plane compression, Composite Structures, 149, 2016, 106–113.
[26] Ferreira, L.M., Graciani, E., París, F., Predicting failure load of a non-crimp fabric composite by means of a 3D finite element model including progressive damage, Composite Structures, 225, 2019, 111115.
[27] Gouskos, D., Iannucci, L., A failure model for the analysis of cross-ply Non-Crimp Fabric (NCF) composites under in-plane loading: Experimental & numerical study, Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 271, 2022, 108575.
[28] Ferreira, L.M., Coelho, C., Modelling Progressive Damage in NCF Composites using the Continuum Damage Mechanics Method, 2022 Advances in Science and Engineering Technology International Conferences (ASET), Dubai, United Arab Emirates, IEEE, 2022.
[29] Athreya, S., Ma, L., Barpanda, D., Jacob, G., Verghese, N., Estimation of in-plane elastic properties of stitch-bonded, non-crimp fabric composites for engineering applications, Journal of Composite Materials, 48, 2014, 143–154.
[30] Ferreira, L.M., Graciani, E., París, F., In-plane shear behaviour of non-crimp fabric laminates by means of 3D finite element analysis, IV ECCOMAS Thematic Conference on the Mechanical Response of Composites COMPOSITES 2013, 2013.
[31] Shabani, P., Li, L., Laliberte, J., Qi, G., Balancing High-Fidelity and Model Efficiency of Damage Prediction of Composite Structures, Continuum, 2, 1750, 100.
[32] Joffe, R., Mechanical properties and failure of non-crimp fabric composites subjected to shear stress, 13th European Conference on Composite Materials (ECCM13), 2008.
[33] Joffe, R., Performance of Non-Crimp Fabric Composites in Shear, Key Engineering Materials, 425, 2010, 45–59.
[34] Yin, H., Zhang, K., Li, Q., Iannucci, L., Meso-scale finite element modelling of biaxial non-crimp-fabric composites under compression, International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 282, 2024, 109583.
[35] Yin, H., Iannucci, L., An experimental and finite element investigation of compression-after-impact (CAI) behaviour of biaxial carbon fibre non-crimp-fabric (NCF) based composites, Composite Structures, 281, 2022, 115057.
[36] Rouhi, M., Ghayoor, H., Hoa, S.V., Hojjati, M., Computational efficiency and accuracy of multi-step design optimization method for variable stiffness composite structures, Thin-Walled Structures, 113, 2017, 136–143.
[37] Nan, C., Ruan, H., Ju, X., Hu, J., Liang, L., Xu, Y., Transfer-learning-based strategy for enhancing prediction accuracy and computational efficiency of nonlinear mechanical properties in composite materials, Composites Science and Technology, 246, 2024, 110388.
[38] EN6031, Aerospace series - Fibre reinforced plastics - Test method: Determination of in-plane shear properties (± 45° tensile test).
[39] Failure, performance and processing prediction for enhanced design with non-crimp fabric composites (FALCOM), https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/G4RD-CT-2001-00604 (accessed February 20, 2024).
[40] Joffe, R., Characterization of performance. Performance in tension. In-plane shear, Tech. rep., FALCOM/WP3:T3.2.1/LTU/IPS, 2004.
[41] González, A., Graciani, E., París, F., In-plane shear, Tech. rep., FALCOM/WP3:T3.2.1/AICIA/IPS, 2005.
[42] ANSYS Mechanical APDL, Release 18.2, 2017.
[43] Ditcher, A., The non-linear stress-strain behaviour of carbon fibre reinforced plastic and its effect on the analysis of laminated plates and sandwich beams, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Bristol, 1981.
[44] FALCOM Technical Annex - Project Programme, Tech. rep., FALCOM/WP1/QQ/PM002, 2002.
[45] Baaran, J., DLR structural element definition and test plan, Tech. rep., FALCOM/WP3/DLRTECH0003, 2004.
[46] Hong, J., Zhang, S., Fang, H., Xu, X., Xie, H., Wang, Y., Structural performance of textile reinforced concrete sandwich panels under axial and transverse load, Reviews on Advanced Materials Science, 60, 2021, 64–79.
[47] Zhang, H., Wang, M., Wen, W., Xu, Y., Cui, H., Textile-reinforced concrete under multiaxial stress states: A review of experimental and numerical research, Composites Part B: Engineering, 221, 2021, 108970.
[48] Kovalova, N., Experimental and numerical study of sewing seams of automobile seat covers under unidirectional and multiaxial loading, Tekstil ve Konfeksiyon, 29, 2019, 322-335.
[49] Barbero, E.J., Finite element analysis of composite materials using Abaqus®, CRC Press, 2023.
[50] Sinclar, R., Robinson, P., Iannucci, L., Directed compression tests on FALCOM biaxial cross-ply material, FALCOM/WP3/ICL/TR01, 2005.
[51] Nettles, A.T., Basic mechanics of laminated composite plates, Tech. Rep., 1994.
[52] Jones, R.M., Mechanics of Composite Materials, 2nd Ed., CRC Press, 2018.
[53] Asp, L., Determination of fibre content on RFI plates for G1c and OHT testing, Tech. Rep., FALCOM/WP3/SI/TECH001, 2004.