Flow Accelerated Corrosion Prediction in High Pressure Economizer of a Heat Recovery Steam Generator

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors
Phuris Khunphakdee 1
Kiattikhoon Phuakpunk 2
Benjapon Chalermsinsuwan 3
1 Program of Petrochemistry and Polymer Science, Chulalongkorn University, 254 Phaya Thai Rd, Pathum Wan, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
2 Energy Research Institute, Chulalongkorn University, 254 Phaya Thai Rd, Pathum Wan, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
3 Fuels Research Center and Center of Excellence on Petrochemical and Materials Technology, Chulalongkorn University, 254 Phaya Thai Rd, Pathum Wan, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
10.22055/jacm.2024.47760.4782
Abstract
This paper examines the flow accelerated corrosion in tubes downstream of an inlet header of the High-Pressure Economizer system using computational fluid dynamics (CFD). This problem was recently identified in a heat recovery steam generator. The k-ε RNG model with enhanced wall functions was employed. CFD results showed that, at the ends of inlet pipes, abrupt change in flow area resulted in recirculation and jet flow. Flow acceleration downstream of the inlet pipes caused strong recirculation at the entrance of two to three tubes extending from the inlet pipes’ centerline. This recirculation forced the flow in the remaining area to accelerate, causing higher wall shear stresses on the side opposite the recirculation. As high shear stresses correlate with the locations where the flow accelerated corrosion occurs severely in practice, the Chilton-Colburn analogy was applied for FAC rate prediction. Predicted rates and measured rates agreed, although some predicted values were overestimated. The distributions of predicted FAC rates matched the tubes thickness distributions. The maximum predicted rate was 0.739 mm/year on the left wall of tube 11 at an elevation 0.045 m below the header centerline. Lastly, a design of experiments was conducted, varying operating flow temperature, pressure, and velocity. ANOVA revealed that FAC in this case was most sensitive to flow velocity. The operating temperature, pressure and tube average velocity that resulted in the minimum FAC rate of 0.424 mm/year were 160.48°C, 190.76 bar, and 0.639 m/s, respectively.
Keywords
High Pressure Economizer
Computational Fluid Dynamics
Flow Accelerated Corrosion
Mass Transfer Coefficient
Wall Shear Stress
Subjects

Publisher’s Note Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

[1] Khunphakdee, P., Chalermsinsuwan, B., Review of flow accelerated corrosion mechanism, numerical analysis, and control measures, Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 197, 2023, 519-535.
[2] Caravaggio, M., Shulder, S., Guidelines for control of flow-accelerated corrosion in fossil and combined cycle plants, Palo Alto: EPRI, 2017.
[3] Dooley, B., Lister, D., Flow-Accelerated Corrosion in Steam Generating Plants, Power Plant Chemistry, 20(4), 2018, 194-244.
[4] Madasamy, P., Krishna Mohan, T. V., Sylvanus, A., et al., Hydrodynamic effects on flow accelerated corrosion at 120 °C and neutral pH conditions, Engineering Failure Analysis, 94, 2018, 458-468.
[5] Utanohara, Y., Murase, M., Influence of flow velocity and temperature on flow accelerated corrosion rate at an elbow pipe, Nuclear Engineering and Design, 342, 2019, 20-28.
[6] Kim, D. J., Kim, S. W., Lee, J. Y., et al., Flow-accelerated corrosion assessment for SA106 and SA335 pipes with elbows and welds, Nuclear Engineering and Technology, 53, 2021, 3003-3011.
[7] Hur, D.-H., Han, J., Lee, Y.-K., Atomic-Scale Insights into Flow-Accelerated Corrosion of Carbon Steel, Metals, 14, 2024, 445.
[8] Prasad, M., Gopika, V., Sridharan, A., et al., Pipe wall thickness prediction with CFD based mass transfer coefficient and degradation feedback for flow accelerated corrosion, Progress in Nuclear Energy, 107, 2018, 205-214.
[9] Chae, Y. H., Kim, S. G., Kim, H., et al., A methodology for diagnosing FAC induced pipe thinning using accelerometers and deep learning models, Annals of Nuclear Energy, 143, 2020, 107501.
[10] Madasamy, P., Chandramohan, P., Mukunthan, M., et al., Flow accelerated corrosion rate on carbon steel pipe bend by thin layer activation technique and computational modeling: Under PHWR operating conditions, Engineering Failure Analysis, 121, 2021, 105125.
[11] Madasamy, P., Mukunthan, M., Chandramohan, P., et al., Influence of bend geometry on flow accelerated corrosion under neutral pH conditions, Engineering Failure Analysis, 122, 2021, 105127.
[12] Yoneda, K., Uchiyama, Y., Morita, R., et al., Prediction of flow-accelerated corrosion in single/dual elbow in pipelines considering geometric parameters and layout effect, Mechanical Engineering Journal, 10, 2023, 322-344.
[13] Utanohara, Y., Nagaya, Y., Nakamura, A., et al., Influence of local flow field on flow accelerated corrosion downstream from an orifice, Journal of Power and Energy Systems, 6, 2012, 18-33.
[14] Ahmed, W. H., Bello, M. M., El Nakla, M., et al., Flow and mass transfer downstream of an orifice under flow accelerated corrosion conditions, Nuclear Engineering and Design, 252, 2012, 52-67.
[15] Lin, C., Ferng, Y. M., Predictions of hydrodynamic characteristics and corrosion rates using CFD in the piping systems of pressurized-water reactor power plant, Annals of Nuclear Energy, 65, 2014, 214–222.
[16] Bignold, G. J., Garbett, K., Garnsey, R., and Woolsey, I. S., Erosion Corrosion of Mild Steel in Ammoniated Water, Proceedings of the 8th International Congress on Metallic Corrosion, Mainz, 1981.
[17] Wang, C.-C., Yang, K.-S., Tsai, J.-S., et al., Characteristics of flow distribution in compact parallel flow heat exchangers, part I: Typical inlet header, Applied Thermal Engineering, 31, 2011, 3226-3234.
[18] Wei, M., Fan, Y., Luo, L., et al., CFD-based evolutionary algorithm for the realization of target fluid flow distribution among parallel channels, Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 100, 2015, 341-352.
[19] ASME, BPVC Section II-Materials-Part A-Ferrous Material Specifications, 2023.
[20] Zhao, Y., Akolekar, H. D., Weatheritt, J., et al., RANS turbulence model development using CFD-driven machine learning, Journal of Computational Physics, 411, 2020, 109413.
[21] Wei, H., Chen, Y., Assessment of different turbulence models on the large scale internal heated water pool natural convection simulation, Annals of Nuclear Energy, 131, 2019, 23-38.
[22] Phuris, K., Ratchanon, P., Benjapon, C., Assessing Turbulent Models for Flow Accelerated Corrosion Prediction in a 90-Degree Bend, Journal of Advanced Research in Fluid Mechanics and Thermal Sciences, 119, 2024, 28-41.
[23] Yakhot, V., Thangam, S., Gatski, T. B., et al., Development of Turbulence Models for Shear Flows by a Double Expansion technique, Physics of Fluids A: Fluid Dynamics, 4(7), 1992, 1510-1520.
[24] Ansys Fluent; 2023 R1, 2023.
[25] Cengel, Y. A., Ghajar, A. J., Heat and Mass Transfer Fundamentals and Applications, McGraw-Hill Higher Education, 2011.
[26] Yoneda, K., Morita, R., Fujiwara, K., Quantitative evaluation of effective factors on flow accelerated corrosion Part 4 Evaluation of wall thinning profile in piping elements, Denryoku Chuo Kenkyusho Hokoku, 2010.
[27] ASME, Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Section II, Part A New York, USA, 2021.
[28] Huang, F., Qiu, D., Peng, L., et al., Optimization of entrance geometry and analysis of fluid distribution in manifold for high-power proton exchange membrane fuel cell stacks, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 47, 2022, 22180-22191.
[29] Jiang, Y., Alawee, W. H., Essa, F. A., et al., Effect of area ratio and Reynolds number on the distribution of discharge in dividing manifold, International Journal of Low-Carbon Technologies, 17, 2022, 1271-1279.
Journal of Applied and Computational Mechanics
Volume 11, Issue 4
Autumn 2025
Pages 904-916