The Effects of Defects and Adherend Material on Adhesive Stress Distribution in Laminated Composite Tubular Joints Under Axial Tensile Loads

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors
Mechanical Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran
Abstract
This study focuses on the effects of an adhesive defect and adherend type and material on stress distribution in laminated composite tubular joints sustaining axial tensile loads. The tubular joint comprised two hollow tubes joined by a layer of adhesive to form a simple lap joint, hosting a cylindrical void or debond. The adherends were assumed to be either isotropic, quasi-isotropic, orthotropic, or transversely isotropic. Applying linear elasticity, the equilibrium equations were derived and solved using the differential quadrature method. Furthermore, finite element models of the joint were prepared and solved to support the semi-analytical solutions. Good agreements were observed between the results of both methods. Based on the results, for a defect-free joint with a bond length of 30 mm, nearly 80% of the bond length experienced zero peel stress (σr), while this value was about 20% for the peak interfacial shear stress (τrx)max. Additionally, among the selected types of glass/epoxy outer tubes, the [08] lamination setup minimized (τrx)max while (σr)max was the least for the quasi-isotropic arrangement of [0/90/-45/45]S. Moreover, replacing the aluminum inner tube with steel, reduced the tensile peak peel stress by 38% and increased the peak shear stresses by 12%. However, compared to a defect-free joint, a void/debond in the adhesive layer highly affected the magnitudes and locations of the adhesive peak interfacial shear and the tensile peel stresses. Additional results showed that in a defective adhesive hosting a void, the application of [08] transversely isotropic carbon/epoxy can reduce the adhesive peak shear stresses by 200% compared to glass/epoxy. 
Keywords
Subjects

Publisher’s Note Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

[1] Mittal, K.L., Panigrahi, S.K., (Eds.) Structural Adhesive Joints: Design, Analysis and Testing, Wiley-Scrivener, Beverly, MA, 2020.
[2] Shishesaz, M., Stress distribution and design analysis of adhesively bonded tubular joints: A review, Progress in Adhesion and Adhesives, Vol. 7, Mittal (Ed.), K.L., Chapter 1, Wiley-Scrivener, Beverly, MA, 2024.
[3] Shishesaz, M., Hosseini, M., Effects of joint geometry and material on stress distribution, strength and failure of bonded composite joints: an overview, Journal of Adhesion, 96, 2020, 1053-1121.
[4] Shishesaz, M., Reza, A., The effect of viscoelasticity of polymeric adhesives on shear stress distribution in a single-lap joint, Journal of Adhesion, 89, 2013, 859-880.
[5] Reza, A., Shishesaz, M., Naderantahan, K., The effect of viscoelasticity on creep behavior of double lap adhesively bonded joint, Latin American Journal of Solids and Structures, 11(1), 2014, 35-50.
[6] Goland, M., Reissner, E., The Stresses in Cemented joints, Journal of Applied Mechanics, Transaction of ASME, 11(1), 1944, A17-A27.
[7] Lubkin, J.L., Reissner, E., Stress distribution and design data for adhesive lap joints between circular tubes, Journal of Applied Mechanics, Transaction of ASME, 78, 1956, 1213-1221.
[8] Alwar, R.S., Nagaraja, Y.R., Viscoelastic analysis of an adhesive tubular joint, Journal of Adhesion, 8, 1976, 79-92.
[9] Adams, R.D., Peppiatt, N.A., Stress analysis of adhesive bonded tubular lap joints, Journal of Adhesion, 19, 1977, 1–18.
[10] Thomsen, O.T., Elasto-static and elasto-plastic stress analysis of adhesive bonded tubular lap joints, Composite Structures, 21, 1992, 249-259.
[11] Shi, Y.P., Cheng, S., Analysis of adhesive-bonded cylindrical lap joints subjected to axial load, Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 119, 1993, 584-602.
[12] Kim, Y.G., Lee, S.J., Lee, D.G., Jeong, K.S., Strength analysis of adhesively-bonded tubular single lap steel-steel joints under axial loads considering residual thermal stresses, Journal of Adhesion, 60, 1997, 125-140.
[13] Cho, D.H., Lee, D.G., Optimum design of co-cured steel–composite tubular single lap joints under axial load, Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology, 14(7), 2000, 939-63.
[14] Kim, J.K., Lee, D.G., Thermal characteristics of tubular single lap adhesive joints under axial loads, Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology, 15, 2001, 1511–1528.
[15] Vaziri, A., Nayeb-Hashemi, H., Dynamic response of tubular joints with an annular void subjected to a harmonic torsional load, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part K: Journal of Multi-body Dynamics, 216(4), 2002, 361-70
[16] Pugno, N., Carpinteri, A., Tubular adhesive joints under axial load, Journal of Applied Mechanics, 70, 2003, 832-839.
[17] Nemes, O., Lachaud, F., Mojtabi, A., Contribution to the study of cylindrical adhesive joining, International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives, 26, 2006, 474-480.
[18] Lees, J.M., Behaviour of GFRP adhesive pipe joints subjected to pressure and axial loadings, Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, 37(8), 2006, 1171-1179.
[19] Kumar, S., Analysis of tubular adhesive joints with a functionally modulus graded bondline subjected to axial loads, International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives, 29, 2009, 785-795.
[20] Das, R.R., Pradhan, B., Adhesion failure analyses of bonded tubular single lap joints in laminated fibre reinforced plastic composites, International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives, 30, 2010, 425–438.
[21] Labbe, S., Drouet, J.-M., A multi-objective optimization procedure for bonded tubular-lap joints subjected to axial loading, International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives, 33, 2012, 26–35.
[22] Dragoni, E., Goglio, L., Adhesive stresses in axially-loaded tubular bonded joints—Part I: Critical review and finite element assessment of published models, International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives, 47, 2013, 35–45.
[23] Goglio, L., Paolino, D.S., Adhesive stresses in axially-loaded tubular bonded joints—Part II: Development of an explicit closed-form solution for the Lubkin and Reissner model, International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives, 48, 2014, 35–42.
[24] Aimmanee, S., Hongpimolmas, P., Ruangjirakit, K., Simplified analytical model for adhesive-bonded tubular joints with isotropic and composite adherends subjected to tension, International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives, 86, 2018, 59-72.
[25] Barbosa, D.R., Campilho, R.D.S.G., Rocha, R.J.B., Ferreira, L.R.F., Experimental and numerical assessment of tensile loaded tubular adhesive joints, Journal of Materials: Design and Applications, 233, 2019, 452–464.
[26] Shishesaz, M., Tehrani, S., The effects of circumferential voids or debonds on stress distribution in tubular adhesive joints under torsion, Journal of Adhesion, 96, 2019, 1396-1430.
[27] Shishesaz, M., Tehrani, S., Interfacial shear stress distribution in the adhesively bonded tubular joints under tension with a circumferential void or debond, Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology, 34, 2020, 1172-1205.
[28] Shishesaz, M., Bavi, N., Shear stress distribution in adhesive layers of a double-lap joint with void or bond separation, Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology, 27(11), 2013, 1197-225.
[29] Oh, J.H., Nonlinear analysis of adhesively bonded tubular single-lap joints for composites in torsion, Composites Science and Technology, 67, 2007, 1320–1329.
[30] daSilva, L.F.M., João, M., Lopes, C.Q., Joint strength optimization by the mixed-adhesive technique, International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives, 29, 2009, 509–514.
[31] Shishesaz, M., Ghamarian, A., Moradi, S., Stress distribution in laminated composite tubular joints with damaged adhesive layer under torsion, Journal of Adhesion, 99, 2023, 930-971.
[32] Ghamarian, M., Stress analysis of adhesively bonded laminated composite pipes with a tubular void or debond, M.Sc. Thesis, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran, 2021.