[1] Godunov, S.K., Bohachevsky, I., Finite difference method for numerical computation of discontinuous solutions of the equations of fluid dynamics, Matematičeskij Sbornik, 47(89), 1959, 271–306.
[2] Harten, A., High resolution schemes for hyperbolic conservation laws, Journal of Computational Physics, 49, 1983, 357–393.
[3] Dubey, R.K., Flux limited schemes, Their classification and accuracy based on total variation stability regions, Applied Mathematics and Computation, 224, 2013, 325–336.
[4] Harten, A., ENO schemes with subcell resolution, The Journal of Computational Physics, 83(1), 1989, 148–184.
[5] Harten, A., Engquist, B., Osher, S., Chakravarthy, S.R., Uniformly high order accurate essentially non-oscillatory schemes, III, Journal of Computational Physics, 131, 1997, 3–47.
[6] Shu, C.W., Osher, S., Efficient implementation of essentially non-oscillatory shock- capturing schemes, Journal of Computational Physics, 77, 1988, 439471.
[7] Shu, C.W., Oshers, S., Efficient implementation of essentially non-oscillatory shock- capturing schemes, II, Journal of Computational Physics, 83, 1989, 32–78.
[8] Liu, X.D., Osher, S., Chan, T., Weighted essentially non-oscillatory schemes, Journal of Computational Physics, 115, 1994, 200–212.
[9] Fu, L., Hu, X.Y., Adams, N.A., A family of high-order targeted ENO schemes for compressible-fluid simulations, Journal of Computational Physics, 305, 2016, 333–359.
[10] Fu, L., Hu, X.Y., Adams, N.A., Targeted ENO schemes with tailored resolution property for hyperbolic conservation laws, Journal of Computational Physics, 349, 2017, 97–121.
[11] Fu, L., Hu, X.Y., Adams, N.A., A new class of adaptive high-order targeted ENO schemes for hyperbolic conservation laws, Journal of Computational Physics, 374, 2018, 724–751.
[12] Kemm, F., A comparative study of TVD-limiters-well-known limiters and an introduction of new ones, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, 67, 2011,404–440.
[13] Shu, C.W., High order weighted essentially nonoscillatory schemes for convection dominated problems, SIAM Review, 51, 2009, 82–126.
[14] Jiang, G.S., Shu, C.W., Efficient implementation of weighted ENO schemes, Journal of Computational Physics, 126, 1996, 202–228.
[15] Jiang, G.S., Wu, C.C., A high-order WENO finite difference scheme for the equations of ideal magnetohydrodynamics, The Journal of Computational Physics, 150, 1999, 561–594.
[16] Balsara, D.S., Shu, C.W., Monotonicity preserving weighted essentially non-oscillatory schemes with increasingly high order of accuracy, Journal of Computational Physics, 160, 2000, 405–452.
[17] Henrick, A.K., Aslam, T.D., Powers, J.M., Mapped weighted essentially non-oscillatory schemes: Achieving optimal order near critical points, Journal of Computational Physics, 207, 2005, 542–567.
[18] Borges, R., Carmona, M., Costa, B., Don, W.S., An improved weighted essentially non- oscillatory scheme for hyperbolic conservation laws, Journal of Computational Physics, 227, 2008, 3191–3211.
[19] Hill, D., Pullin, D.I., Hybrid tuned center-difference-WENO method for large eddy simulations in the presence of strong shocks, Journal of Computational Physics, 194, 2004, 435–450.
[20] Hu, X.Y., Wang, Q., Adams, N.A., An adaptive central-upwind weighted essentially non-oscillatory scheme, Journal of Computational Physics, 229, 2010, 8952–8965.
[21] Hu, X.Y., Adams, N.A., Scale separation for implicit large eddy simulation, Journal of Computational Physics, 230, 2011, 7240–7249.
[22] Ha, Y., Kim, C.H., Lee, Y.J., Yoon, J., An improved weighted essentially non-oscillatory scheme with a new smoothness indicator, Journal of Computational Physics, 232, 2013, 68–86.
[23] Kim, C.H., Ha, Y., Yoon, J., Modified non-linear weights for fifth-order weighted essentially non-oscillatory schemes, Journal of Scientific Computing, 67, 2016, 299–323.
[24] Wibisono, I., Yanuar, Kosasih, E.A., Fifth-order Hermite targeted essentially non- oscillatory schemes for hyperbolic conservation laws, Journal of Scientific Computing, 87 2021.
[25] Fu, L., Review of the high-order TENO schemes for compressible gas dynamics and turbulence, Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering, 30, 2023, 2493–2526.
[26] Fernandez-Fidalgo, J., Ramırez, L., Tsoutsanis, P., Colominas, I., Nogueira, X.., A reduced-dissipation WENO scheme with automatic dissipation adjustment, Journal of Computational Physics, 425, 2021, 109749.
[27] Xiao, F., Honma, Y., Kono, T., A simple algebraic interface capturing scheme using hyperbolic tangent function, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, 48, 2005, 1023–1040.
[28] Takagi, S., Fu, L., Wakimura, H., Xiao, F., A novel high-order low-dissipation TENO- THINC scheme for hyperbolic conservation laws, Journal of Computational Physics, 452, 2022, 110899.
[29] Sun, Z., Inaba, S., Xiao, F., Boundary variation diminishing (BVD) reconstruction: A new approach to improve godunov schemes, Journal of Computational Physics, 322, 2016, 309–325.
[30] Deng, X., Jiang, Z.H., Vincent, P., Xiao, F., Yan, C., A new paradigm of dissipation- adjustable, multi-scale resolving schemes for compressible flows, Journal of Computational Physics, 466, 2022, 111287.
[31] Pirozzoli, S., On the spectral properties of shock-capturing schemes, Journal of Computational Physics, 219, 2006, 489–497.
[32] Zhang, X., Jiang, Z., Qin, X., Qu, F., Yan, C., A finite difference scale-adaptive TENO scheme for turbulence simulations, Journal of Computational Physics, 502, 2024, 112793.
[33] Li, Y., Chen, C., Ren, Y.X., A class of high-order finite difference schemes with minimized dispersion and adaptive dissipation for solving compressible flows, Journal of Computational Physics, 448, 2022, 110770.
[34] Roe, P.L., Approximate riemann solvers, parameter vectors, and difference schemes, Journal of Computational Physics, 43, 1981, 357–372.
[35] Toro, E.F., Spruce, M., Speares, W., Restoration of the contact surface in the HLL- Riemann solver, Shock Wave, 4, 1994, 25–34.
[36] Fleischmann, N., Adami, S., Adams, N.A., Numerical symmetry-preserving techniques for low-dissipation shock-capturing schemes, Computers & Fluids, 189, 2019, 94–107.
[37] Gottlieb, S., Shu, C.W., Total variation diminishing Runge-Kutta schemes, Mathematics of Computation, 67, 1998, 913–915.
[38] Sod, G.A., A survey of several finite difference methods for systems of nonlinear hyperbolic conservation laws, Journal of Computational Physics, 27, 1978, 1–31.
[39] Lax, P.D., Weak solutions of nonlinear hyperbolic-equations and their numerical computation, Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics, VII, 1954, 159–193.
[40] Woodward, P., Colella, P., The numerical simulation of two-dimensional fluid flow with strong shocks, Journal of Computational Physics, 54, 1984, 115–173.
[41] Xu, Z., Shu, C.W., Anti-diffusive flux corrections for high order finite difference WENO schemes, Journal of Computational Physics, 205, 2005, 458–485.
[42] Schulz-Rinne, C.W., Collin, J.P., Glaz, H.M., Numerical solution of the Riemann problem for two-dimensional gas dynamics, SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 14, 1993, 1394–1414.
[43] Yang, T., Zhao, G., Zhao, Q., Novel TENO schemes with improved accuracy order based on perturbed polynomial reconstruction, Journal of Computational Physics, 488, 2023, 112219.
[44] Liska, R., Wendroff, B., Comparison of several difference schemes in 1D and 2D test problems for the Euler equations, SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 25, 2003, 995-1017.